Compare and contrast the two artworks Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Compare and contrast the both art plys - Essay ExampleIn both sculptures, mechanics prevail utilized the concept of contrast intended to give varied quarrys comprising main artworks real implications2,3. This is to ensure individually artwork despite appearing different from the other they have brought the required meaning. For instance, the most striking and popular contrast evident in these two artworks is the aspect of color-light interaction. Light in these two artworks strikes them from a starting time placed up diagonally in relation to the objects position. Hence, illuminating varied and key areas of the artworks the way a real sun would suppose it was during daytime and in the open station far from the buildings or some(prenominal) other shelter. However, lightning in both artworks varies considerably whereby Cubi XIXs gleaming intensity is more than that of atomic number 1 Moores figure. This is despite the source of illumination casting shadows beneath the two w orks. Probably, the reason why Cubi XIXs illumination exceeds that of atomic number 1 Moores figure is due to its placement, which is outside as per the artists desire for the object to reflect any change of the natural light4. Similarly, the two objects have also utilized negative space with the intention of creating three-dimensional works5. Hence, this induces the aspect of depth evident when observing spaces and holes tack in between varied objects overlapping each other without being in contact. However, in the Henry Moores figure, its holes appear natural compared to those found in David Smiths artwork. Since, the latter(prenominal) due to its geometrical shapes suggest the holes comprising negative spaces are artificial, which is contrary to Henry Moores figure6. Since, Henry Moores artwork comprises of oval and irregular holes inside it, which is contrary to David Smiths object whose varied objects are geometric and be to assume a certain array with the intention of attai ning the required balance. Artists through these two artworks despite relaying divers(a) massages, their various(prenominal) emphasizes varies considerably. This is evident in the mode of utilizing light whereby David Smiths object has increased illumination compared to that of Henry Moore. The latter artists emphasis encompasses depicting the entire object evident from its mild illumination, which is similar to a light produced by an artificial source, and striking an item under a shade or in a building. This is contrary to Cubi XIX, which focuses on depicting varied natural lights alterations, which is the sun. Hence, prompting the artist to use beaten steel as the objects sole material so that it may reflect the light as necessitated. This is evident from the varied parts of the entire objects that have high illumination intensity compared to both its rear parts and those of Henry Moore figure. Another outstanding divergence between the two objects encompasses the aspect of t exture whereby Henry Moores artwork has an extremely smooth surface than that of David Smiths artwork7. Mainly, this emanates from the materials constituting the two respective works. David Smiths figure is not evenly smooth except in spaces or distortions made on the steel by the sculptors tool when shaping it to assume the required shape. However, Henry Moore in his work seems to have used a special tool in combination with hands to attain an appealing surface to feel. Since, the material comprising its artwork seems to be clay or any other similar content