The UK Medical Law - the Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia Research Paper

The UK Medical faithfulness - the Ethical Dilemma of Euthanasia - Research Paper ExampleThere ar some cases that result be identified and included in this research to fully discuss the true meaning in behind if mercy killing is considered legally and illegally permissible in health check cases where the patient is terminally ill. Also, the ferocity is given as to when medical treatment can be legally withdrawn due to the futility of the medical illness. In the conclusion, this research points out that although there are legal restraints preventing doctors to engage in treatments that result in the patients livelihood being taken, there are numerous ethical considerations that have to be taken into tale as well. Within cases like these, nothing is ever easy, especially when it involves someone who is terminally ill and has no hope of survival. Euthanasia has been in heated debate for a good while now inwardly the UK. However, there have been numerous changes taking place wit hin its concept but one moldiness ask do these changes go along with the old idea that insinuates any doctors or family members who engage in treatment regimens that are ultimately meant for ending the patients life should still be held legally liable in a court of law and from there face criminal charges from prosecution?Unfortunately, within the UK there are still legal grounds that are enforced in regards to anyone who ends anothers life no matter of whether it was for a medical reason or whether the individual wanted assistance in ending their life period. It is not legally permissible or ethical to carry out medical cases such as these but it is being done anyway. However, those who want to die will search for any means achievable such as with cases where patients have traveled to Switzerland to have doctors there perform assisted suicides or euthanasia procedures because it is legal in that country (Spinney 2005). The point is that no one wants to have to suffer unbearable a nd torturous agony with an illness that has no hope of a cure or adequate treatment computer program available. In this regard, the UK needs to realize that its citizens deserve to have the right to die in a reward fashion when they deem it is appropriate, not when the government states it is logical. In this case, there is no fallible reason rear in the statement that medical treatment should be legally impermissible if it is being carried out in correlation with the patients right to die.